Transcript
1
00:00:00,017 --> 00:00:02,977
Hey, everyone. Welcome back to How I Met Your Data. Sandy here.
2
00:00:03,137 --> 00:00:07,237
You know, this whole podcast adventure has been a wild ride so far.
3
00:00:07,417 --> 00:00:09,917
And honestly, I'm just so thrilled you're all here for it.
4
00:00:10,117 --> 00:00:13,477
We've got a lot of love since we kicked things off. And it's been amazing to
5
00:00:13,477 --> 00:00:17,937
see how many of you are really into our chats about data, life and stuff in between.
6
00:00:18,097 --> 00:00:22,137
So what's on the menu today? Well, Anjali and I are going to be diving into
7
00:00:22,137 --> 00:00:24,117
some of the stuff that really caught us off guard lately.
8
00:00:24,497 --> 00:00:28,277
We're also going to chat about what what it's like being in the trenches as
9
00:00:28,277 --> 00:00:31,597
consultants, you know, the whole dance of navigating company dynamics.
10
00:00:31,817 --> 00:00:36,377
Plus, personally, I've been pondering a lot about the human side of all of this.
11
00:00:36,737 --> 00:00:39,817
It's not just about the tools and technologies, but the people behind them.
12
00:00:39,877 --> 00:00:43,277
And sometimes I feel like we're all in a little need of therapy,
13
00:00:43,417 --> 00:00:45,117
maybe data therapy, perhaps.
14
00:00:45,437 --> 00:00:49,577
So grab your favorite snack, find a comfy spot. If you're driving,
15
00:00:49,737 --> 00:00:52,177
that's fine, too. And well, let's get into it.
16
00:00:54,320 --> 00:01:07,920
Music.
17
00:01:09,517 --> 00:01:12,717
You can always edit things out sandy correct
18
00:01:12,717 --> 00:01:16,037
that is correct it's been a week huh it has
19
00:01:16,037 --> 00:01:19,657
been a week it's been quite a week actually we launched
20
00:01:19,657 --> 00:01:26,317
our podcast to a bunch of excitement which was was amazing to hear how many
21
00:01:26,317 --> 00:01:32,937
people enjoyed hearing us banter and chat about data and life and how excited
22
00:01:32,937 --> 00:01:37,457
they are to hear us keep talking. Is there anything that surprised you this week?
23
00:01:37,677 --> 00:01:43,877
I think one of the things that surprised me is I'm seeing the same themes just
24
00:01:43,877 --> 00:01:47,277
come up again and again as I work with more and more people, right?
25
00:01:47,397 --> 00:01:54,237
So looking at different policies, of a data governance, we see kind of this two-pronged approach.
26
00:01:54,417 --> 00:02:01,597
Either organizations and individuals will over-index on a policy or kind of
27
00:02:01,597 --> 00:02:04,917
sweep it under the rug and say, you know, we'll deal with it when we deal with it.
28
00:02:05,097 --> 00:02:08,437
And then the other thing, it's just kind of like a twofold thing,
29
00:02:08,557 --> 00:02:15,277
is as we see organizations take on policies, there's also a resistance to a change.
30
00:02:15,577 --> 00:02:19,137
It's the whole organizational construct, right? You never know what's behind
31
00:02:19,137 --> 00:02:23,617
the veil because you're dealing with maybe one layer or two layers of the organization,
32
00:02:23,857 --> 00:02:27,857
but there's other things going on around them that sometimes we're not exposed
33
00:02:27,857 --> 00:02:29,237
to as consultants, right?
34
00:02:29,397 --> 00:02:32,637
I think that's a great segue into our conversation today.
35
00:02:32,797 --> 00:02:38,557
For me, the thing that surprised me the the most this week is that I didn't
36
00:02:38,557 --> 00:02:46,077
expect Gen AI to become a thing that is created in shadows.
37
00:02:46,377 --> 00:02:51,017
I've had multiple conversations between last week and this week of organizations saying.
38
00:02:51,802 --> 00:02:56,302
Yeah, people are building stuff and we need to control it.
39
00:02:56,382 --> 00:03:02,322
It reminds me of when folks were buying Tableau and Power BI and some other
40
00:03:02,322 --> 00:03:06,302
tool in pockets across the organization and couldn't get a hold of it because
41
00:03:06,302 --> 00:03:08,582
it was just happening and procurement was allowing for it.
42
00:03:08,902 --> 00:03:13,982
But what's interesting about the way technology is shifting right now is that anybody can do it.
43
00:03:14,042 --> 00:03:17,222
There's so much information out on the internet, right, in terms of how to do
44
00:03:17,222 --> 00:03:19,362
things that almost everybody's an expert.
45
00:03:19,502 --> 00:03:23,802
That shocked me, I think, more than I expected. I did not expect it to take that route.
46
00:03:24,022 --> 00:03:26,902
That says more about me, I think, than the people out there.
47
00:03:27,022 --> 00:03:29,502
I don't blame them for going that route. I think that's fantastic,
48
00:03:29,742 --> 00:03:32,182
right? That's what tools and technologies are for, to enable people.
49
00:03:32,382 --> 00:03:35,622
I didn't expect people to find all this free time to get their hands dirty like
50
00:03:35,622 --> 00:03:40,302
that because it's a leap from Excel to building a model, right?
51
00:03:40,722 --> 00:03:46,342
That's really interesting. And I'd love to to spend some time uncovering,
52
00:03:46,342 --> 00:03:49,982
why do we need to get a handle on it?
53
00:03:50,022 --> 00:03:54,462
What does that mean from a responsible AI perspective and responsible usage
54
00:03:54,462 --> 00:03:56,402
perspective as well? It's exposure.
55
00:03:56,722 --> 00:03:59,982
If you're building a product in isolation from the rest of the organization.
56
00:04:00,542 --> 00:04:01,902
It's a matter of exposure.
57
00:04:02,182 --> 00:04:04,362
And then what are you going to do with it once it gets out of hand?
58
00:04:04,622 --> 00:04:08,082
You're going to hand it off to some centralized group that then has to deal
59
00:04:08,082 --> 00:04:12,682
with however you you band-aided this solution together and they don't want that.
60
00:04:12,722 --> 00:04:16,502
They want something that's scalable, that they can maintain, that they can grow with.
61
00:04:16,602 --> 00:04:21,662
That's ultimately the challenge for specifically, I think any central services
62
00:04:21,662 --> 00:04:24,462
organization within a company, they say, I need to get control.
63
00:04:24,522 --> 00:04:25,762
I need to get control of this.
64
00:04:26,482 --> 00:04:28,442
That's really what they're meaning. Cause they know they're going to end up
65
00:04:28,442 --> 00:04:29,982
with it, right? They're going to end up with that package.
66
00:04:30,162 --> 00:04:31,802
I think we're both talking about
67
00:04:31,802 --> 00:04:36,002
the same thing, right? Like organizations and how they, how they work.
68
00:04:36,202 --> 00:04:40,342
But as consultants, I'm often faced with a few things. I'm triaging them, right?
69
00:04:40,702 --> 00:04:43,362
Are you doing the same thing? You're triaging them in your mind.
70
00:04:43,382 --> 00:04:46,682
I'm constantly trying to get like a quick assessment of who they are,
71
00:04:46,702 --> 00:04:48,302
what they're dealing with, et cetera. How about yourself?
72
00:04:48,867 --> 00:04:53,547
Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. And I think one of the first things that I feel
73
00:04:53,547 --> 00:05:01,327
when I walk into a new situation is two polar opposite emotions,
74
00:05:01,747 --> 00:05:03,327
right? There's this excitement.
75
00:05:03,487 --> 00:05:09,667
There's a new voice in the room, a new team of experts here to help us get a
76
00:05:09,667 --> 00:05:14,607
handle on the things that are challenging us versus that resistance.
77
00:05:14,607 --> 00:05:17,047
Resistance, that resistance to, oh, here we go again.
78
00:05:17,387 --> 00:05:21,347
We've been down this path and, you know, it hasn't worked before.
79
00:05:21,587 --> 00:05:24,227
So why, you know, why is this time different?
80
00:05:24,647 --> 00:05:29,647
And so, you know, behind both of those, those emotions and feelings,
81
00:05:29,987 --> 00:05:33,207
there are a lot of things that we haven't yet uncovered.
82
00:05:33,507 --> 00:05:36,367
Yeah. It's funny because I think the beginning of my career,
83
00:05:36,387 --> 00:05:38,667
I cared very much about what we had to accomplish.
84
00:05:38,947 --> 00:05:42,707
What were the tasks, like very tactical approach to programs.
85
00:05:42,987 --> 00:05:47,167
And now, Now, you know, as I've spent 20 plus years in this situation,
86
00:05:47,447 --> 00:05:52,807
I immediately have this sense of trying to understand the individuals that we're
87
00:05:52,807 --> 00:05:56,227
working with, whether maybe we got engaged through a business partner,
88
00:05:56,327 --> 00:05:59,027
right, or business sponsor for the for the program.
89
00:05:59,247 --> 00:06:03,627
I'm constantly trying to assess the situation and then assessing everybody around them.
90
00:06:03,727 --> 00:06:07,667
All right, well, the business person seems okay. Like, hey, let's go over here
91
00:06:07,667 --> 00:06:10,967
to see if, you know, the technical team has been abused in other different ways
92
00:06:10,967 --> 00:06:15,827
where there's cost cutting and maybe there's other things that are challenging
93
00:06:15,827 --> 00:06:18,567
them to do the right thing for their counterparts, right?
94
00:06:18,747 --> 00:06:22,607
Or maybe they've just been there forever, so they don't even know what they don't know.
95
00:06:22,607 --> 00:06:26,907
So I'm constantly trying to figure that out because I feel that the way to success
96
00:06:26,907 --> 00:06:32,127
is truly through understanding where everybody is coming from and where they're
97
00:06:32,127 --> 00:06:35,887
entering that engagement or that program and trying to figure out, right,
98
00:06:35,927 --> 00:06:40,447
what ladders do I have to create or we have to create as a team to ensure that
99
00:06:40,447 --> 00:06:44,947
they as individuals get what they need out of this? Yeah, bad habits are really easy to perfect.
100
00:06:45,618 --> 00:06:50,938
But oftentimes when we leave, it's easy to go back to what those bad habits were.
101
00:06:51,198 --> 00:06:55,598
Yeah, I agree. I think that's another fun challenge.
102
00:06:55,838 --> 00:07:02,158
I always see our teams trying to manage how people do things with what we give them.
103
00:07:02,338 --> 00:07:06,798
You can't change who they are. You have to give them something that works within
104
00:07:06,798 --> 00:07:11,078
the ways they work and not give them something that we think is the best approach.
105
00:07:11,358 --> 00:07:15,498
Yeah, exactly. Exactly. And it's, you know, we see that miss when we're trying
106
00:07:15,498 --> 00:07:18,518
to give them the Cadillac and, you know, tell them here, go drive it,
107
00:07:18,578 --> 00:07:20,638
whereas they're really just learning how to crawl.
108
00:07:20,758 --> 00:07:24,958
So, you know, following that crawl, walk, run mentality, and we're going a million
109
00:07:24,958 --> 00:07:26,898
miles an hour when they're not ready for that. Yeah.
110
00:07:27,018 --> 00:07:30,678
I mean, we talked about a lot of the beginning of this. We talked about up feel, right?
111
00:07:30,798 --> 00:07:34,818
I guess, why do you think people feel that way when we first engage with them,
112
00:07:34,938 --> 00:07:40,638
whether they're frustrated or they're excited or curious to learn from us?
113
00:07:40,758 --> 00:07:44,438
Why do you think that's happening? Well, I mean, I think that there's a couple
114
00:07:44,438 --> 00:07:46,718
different things that are leading to that.
115
00:07:46,818 --> 00:07:51,338
One, from an excitement perspective, I think the type of personality that is
116
00:07:51,338 --> 00:07:54,938
excited is the one that has the most to gain.
117
00:07:55,058 --> 00:07:59,878
Learning a new way or unlocking something innovative that they know or at least
118
00:07:59,878 --> 00:08:04,258
believe will help their organization. organization or it's going to set them up for success, right?
119
00:08:04,338 --> 00:08:07,778
They've been given an objective from leadership and they know that they need
120
00:08:07,778 --> 00:08:10,698
to introduce change in order to meet that objective.
121
00:08:10,978 --> 00:08:15,758
So there's excitement around that because they're bringing in experts that have done it before.
122
00:08:15,938 --> 00:08:21,218
Whereas where we see the resistance, a lot of that comes from some of the things that you talked about.
123
00:08:21,398 --> 00:08:25,098
You know, parts of the organization have been underfunded.
124
00:08:25,238 --> 00:08:28,478
Others are frustrated and tired. They've been there before.
125
00:08:28,558 --> 00:08:33,658
They've seen change try to come through so many times that they've got change fatigue.
126
00:08:33,978 --> 00:08:39,278
And those individuals, I feel like is the hardest to try to overcome and bring
127
00:08:39,278 --> 00:08:42,518
them along for the journey because they've already been burned so many times.
128
00:08:42,578 --> 00:08:47,758
They've spent so much time in these initiatives that haven't gone anywhere for
129
00:08:47,758 --> 00:08:51,298
them or haven't brought them the value that they were hoping for.
130
00:08:51,378 --> 00:08:54,878
But they're going, what's in it for me? Why do I need to bother. I've already done this.
131
00:08:55,058 --> 00:08:59,138
I love how you brought change fatigue in, right? So there's like that out there
132
00:08:59,138 --> 00:09:03,778
about chief data officers changing to roles, jobs, just about every two years.
133
00:09:03,918 --> 00:09:08,438
I find that interesting because it's a hit on both sides of the equation, right?
134
00:09:08,518 --> 00:09:12,618
Because a lot of them are leaving the practice and being chief data officers.
135
00:09:12,798 --> 00:09:15,058
They're opting out. They're saying, I'm not going to do this anymore.
136
00:09:15,278 --> 00:09:17,898
And that's really why they've been changing is they've been trying to,
137
00:09:17,938 --> 00:09:20,778
it's like Goldilocks trying to find the right, you know, the right house.
138
00:09:20,778 --> 00:09:24,158
And they just cannot find the right org structure.
139
00:09:24,258 --> 00:09:27,998
They can't find the right funding mechanisms or they can't find the right culture.
140
00:09:28,058 --> 00:09:29,958
And they just keep moving from one place to another.
141
00:09:30,118 --> 00:09:33,438
Not that they're not successful while they're there because oftentimes they are.
142
00:09:33,598 --> 00:09:37,318
They do it even regardless of all those other conditions that are presented
143
00:09:37,318 --> 00:09:38,578
to them. So it's exhausting.
144
00:09:38,738 --> 00:09:42,538
It's not just about them leaving. It's about the organization they left behind too.
145
00:09:43,088 --> 00:09:46,228
Because all those individuals are now dealing with, oh, great,
146
00:09:46,428 --> 00:09:49,688
we need, we're going to have another leader come in here and have a different type of vision.
147
00:09:50,068 --> 00:09:57,288
Because leaders at this level have very vast visions. They often attach themselves to different vendors.
148
00:09:57,568 --> 00:10:02,648
They attach themselves to different consulting firms they trust and advisors that they trust.
149
00:10:02,868 --> 00:10:06,588
So they're bringing all of that with them into any organization they walk into.
150
00:10:06,748 --> 00:10:09,788
And I can't tell you the countless times where we're in the middle of a very
151
00:10:09,788 --> 00:10:15,428
large transformation for a client and they hired a new CTO or CIO or CPO or
152
00:10:15,428 --> 00:10:18,008
something, you're relitigating everything that you've done.
153
00:10:18,368 --> 00:10:21,328
Everyone's questioning what you're doing and for good purpose.
154
00:10:21,468 --> 00:10:22,708
And I understand that. But then
155
00:10:22,708 --> 00:10:25,768
at the same time, it's like that that is draining to the organization.
156
00:10:26,448 --> 00:10:31,828
Yeah, absolutely. And I think one of the other things that I've noticed as chief
157
00:10:31,828 --> 00:10:35,828
data officers move from organization to organization is they bring maturity
158
00:10:35,828 --> 00:10:41,108
bias with them as well, where if they've left a well-functioning organization.
159
00:10:41,728 --> 00:10:47,628
Large scale, fully automated, you put all the great qualifiers on there and
160
00:10:47,628 --> 00:10:52,988
they go to an organization that really hasn't gone along the maturity journey.
161
00:10:53,408 --> 00:10:57,488
They have this bias in their mind where they're saying, you should be doing X,
162
00:10:57,508 --> 00:11:02,468
Y, and Z and have expectations of a much more mature organization organization
163
00:11:02,468 --> 00:11:07,888
and are then putting those expectations on a group of individuals that aren't
164
00:11:07,888 --> 00:11:10,528
prepared to meet those expectations. Absolutely.
165
00:11:10,748 --> 00:11:15,028
I also find, as you said about maturity, right, there's different types of organizations,
166
00:11:15,308 --> 00:11:17,148
particularly when it comes to data teams.
167
00:11:17,268 --> 00:11:23,588
I do find that you have sometimes some optimal models for data teams where it
168
00:11:23,588 --> 00:11:27,628
might be, you know, development center based data, data teams are data teams,
169
00:11:27,648 --> 00:11:30,288
and they forget about all all the things that happen around the engineering.
170
00:11:30,768 --> 00:11:37,048
It's almost as if they just assume a pipeline's a pipeline and a data model is a data model.
171
00:11:37,228 --> 00:11:41,268
And they don't think about all the softer things that happen with data work.
172
00:11:41,508 --> 00:11:45,208
The design aspect, the build aspect, the operate aspect separately.
173
00:11:45,448 --> 00:11:49,808
And oftentimes those things are brought in all together in organizations.
174
00:11:49,928 --> 00:11:54,428
So the model doesn't really work because they're not thinking about how am I going to design this.
175
00:11:54,488 --> 00:11:59,028
It's designed in And in isolation, there's no good handoff of best practices,
176
00:11:59,108 --> 00:12:03,628
oversight of best practices on the builds aspect of it.
177
00:12:03,708 --> 00:12:06,748
And then when you're operating on it, that's a whole different skill set for
178
00:12:06,748 --> 00:12:12,628
handling customer issues and making sure that things are working effectively in a production model.
179
00:12:12,968 --> 00:12:18,408
Yeah, that kind of disconnect of the relationship between business and IT that
180
00:12:18,408 --> 00:12:23,728
we've seen it time and again lead to a mistrust between the two groups.
181
00:12:24,668 --> 00:12:28,988
Where the business is saying, I can't really trust that IT is going to deliver
182
00:12:28,988 --> 00:12:34,368
what I need because they're focused on these other things that matter not at
183
00:12:34,368 --> 00:12:36,908
all to me, but I don't know who else is going to use that.
184
00:12:37,088 --> 00:12:39,908
So IT is taking this, build it, and they will come back.
185
00:12:40,442 --> 00:12:45,262
Approach, and nobody comes. And yet the business is sitting here going,
186
00:12:45,462 --> 00:12:50,062
I need help with improving the transparency of my data.
187
00:12:50,142 --> 00:12:54,922
I need help onboarding X, Y, and Z, and there's nobody there to really help them.
188
00:12:55,242 --> 00:12:58,302
I feel bad. I feel like we just spent 20 minutes talking about all the horrible
189
00:12:58,302 --> 00:13:00,282
things that happen with organizations.
190
00:13:02,782 --> 00:13:06,562
I'm wondering, what can be done? What have you seen work? Yeah,
191
00:13:06,622 --> 00:13:14,522
I mean, I think one of the things is really thinking about where can we simplify processes, right?
192
00:13:14,602 --> 00:13:18,762
Where can we bring in easier ways of doing things?
193
00:13:18,842 --> 00:13:22,902
And one of the best ways to do that is introducing automation.
194
00:13:23,182 --> 00:13:29,662
How can we automate some of the what I call skull numbing activities that a
195
00:13:29,662 --> 00:13:31,602
human doesn't need to be performing?
196
00:13:31,682 --> 00:13:37,482
Because we've actually programmed computers to do that job. So how can we identify
197
00:13:37,482 --> 00:13:41,442
those tasks, those capabilities, and introduce automation?
198
00:13:41,982 --> 00:13:45,842
I think another thing I've noticed when the Data Mesh book came out,
199
00:13:46,002 --> 00:13:47,802
I got so excited about it.
200
00:13:48,402 --> 00:13:52,462
And the reason why I got excited about it wasn't actually the technology pieces.
201
00:13:52,762 --> 00:13:57,062
It was the stuff in between it all, which was communication.
202
00:13:57,462 --> 00:14:02,062
And if you think about the architecture and the components and all the ways
203
00:14:02,062 --> 00:14:05,662
organization would be able to work, that the hardest part is the communication
204
00:14:05,662 --> 00:14:08,402
aspect of it, regardless of the architecture.
205
00:14:08,722 --> 00:14:12,802
And what excited me about that book and the concept behind data mesh was that
206
00:14:12,802 --> 00:14:19,362
it was really a shift to build an application platform for data that the entire organization can use.
207
00:14:19,582 --> 00:14:23,542
And then there's more visibility because everybody's on the same kind of ways of working.
208
00:14:23,782 --> 00:14:28,442
And it just really resonated with me because it felt like this This would be
209
00:14:28,442 --> 00:14:30,302
a nice shift if people would go this route.
210
00:14:30,422 --> 00:14:34,942
The sad part is like every technology idea or methodology has gone out there.
211
00:14:35,062 --> 00:14:38,902
Folks have looked at it as a architectural Bible and that is it.
212
00:14:38,982 --> 00:14:43,702
They have lost, again, all the other things around it that need to be there
213
00:14:43,702 --> 00:14:46,462
operationally for an organization to be able to do that effectively.
214
00:14:46,802 --> 00:14:51,262
And that's really a miss in general and why I think these things never take off.
215
00:14:51,776 --> 00:14:55,096
Because everything is, give me the best tool, give me the next new architecture
216
00:14:55,096 --> 00:14:56,076
that's going to solve this problem.
217
00:14:56,256 --> 00:14:58,276
When in reality, you probably don't need to change anything.
218
00:14:58,436 --> 00:15:01,516
You really just need to change the way an organization communicates.
219
00:15:01,676 --> 00:15:07,796
I often push for this idea of ensuring you have data partners within IT that
220
00:15:07,796 --> 00:15:11,276
are interacting with different parts of the business and really understand the
221
00:15:11,276 --> 00:15:12,736
data needs of that part of the business.
222
00:15:13,056 --> 00:15:17,256
Yeah, I love that. That really speaks to me, especially from a governance perspective,
223
00:15:17,456 --> 00:15:22,156
because one of the first things that we really want is a clear understanding
224
00:15:22,156 --> 00:15:23,756
of roles and responsibilities.
225
00:15:24,136 --> 00:15:29,516
Who's doing what? What are their areas of focus so that you can make that distinction
226
00:15:29,516 --> 00:15:32,316
between your IT business partner and your data partner?
227
00:15:32,456 --> 00:15:38,236
When I see that IT business partner performing both the application and the
228
00:15:38,236 --> 00:15:39,936
data and analytics politics activities,
229
00:15:40,296 --> 00:15:46,316
that to me says there isn't really a clear separation of roles and responsibilities,
230
00:15:46,616 --> 00:15:52,816
that we're blurring the lines and we really do need to formalize what is required by each role.
231
00:15:52,996 --> 00:15:58,196
Talk about the communication, but so much of it is collaboration and working
232
00:15:58,196 --> 00:16:03,736
together and ensuring that as we're, from a business perspective,
233
00:16:04,036 --> 00:16:10,576
creating our roadmaps and priorities for the year, they line up with what's actually possible.
234
00:16:11,076 --> 00:16:19,076
So I'll take an example of an organization that was really excited about uncovering
235
00:16:19,076 --> 00:16:23,336
their generative AI use cases. All of their systems were on-prem.
236
00:16:23,932 --> 00:16:31,052
So trying to get that data that they needed to support their AI use cases wasn't
237
00:16:31,052 --> 00:16:38,132
going to fit into their timeline for creating their POCs and creating their value propositions.
238
00:16:38,212 --> 00:16:43,672
So we really needed to sit down and think about what is possible and how do
239
00:16:43,672 --> 00:16:48,712
you align your priorities with what is happening on the modernization side.
240
00:16:49,012 --> 00:16:56,292
Yeah. Speaking about collaboration, I've noticed a recent trend and it worries me more and more.
241
00:16:56,552 --> 00:17:02,832
This is my job, not your job mentality, where they're not sharing in the thought process.
242
00:17:03,092 --> 00:17:06,352
They're not willing to share in terms of where they're going to head or how
243
00:17:06,352 --> 00:17:07,372
they're thinking about it.
244
00:17:07,472 --> 00:17:11,152
It's kind of like, oh, I got your requirements. I'll come back with a grand reveal.
245
00:17:11,512 --> 00:17:15,192
And this could be either part where the business doesn't tell,
246
00:17:15,452 --> 00:17:18,752
they just give IT exactly what they need because they don't trust them.
247
00:17:19,512 --> 00:17:24,212
Or, you know, IT meets with the business and says, I'll come back in six months
248
00:17:24,212 --> 00:17:26,512
and, you know, I'll tell you what I'll do about that.
249
00:17:26,752 --> 00:17:29,252
Have you seen a lot of that? Because I've seen a lot of that recently.
250
00:17:29,372 --> 00:17:32,752
And I just, I look at that and I'm just like, how are you ever going to work
251
00:17:32,752 --> 00:17:38,272
effectively? Exactly. And that, to me, it fits right into that resistance to change.
252
00:17:38,492 --> 00:17:41,392
Because our recommendations, when we talk about collaboration,
253
00:17:41,692 --> 00:17:46,352
is breaking down those walls, and actually being forthcoming and transparent
254
00:17:46,352 --> 00:17:48,432
in terms of what are your priorities?
255
00:17:48,632 --> 00:17:52,072
What are your requirements? What do you need to be successful?
256
00:17:52,232 --> 00:17:55,292
And sharing that with the teams that are.
257
00:17:56,197 --> 00:17:59,677
In place to actually help you be successful. It would be awesome if there was
258
00:17:59,677 --> 00:18:03,757
like a company that just came in and said, look, we're your data therapists.
259
00:18:03,997 --> 00:18:08,657
We're going to come to you and have a conversation with the sponsors on this
260
00:18:08,657 --> 00:18:12,197
side and the sponsors on that side and maybe a level down from there.
261
00:18:12,337 --> 00:18:17,437
And we're going to have this group think in terms of why don't we share our information?
262
00:18:17,797 --> 00:18:21,177
I don't know. Maybe I'm just one of these kumbaya type people. Absolutely.
263
00:18:21,337 --> 00:18:26,477
So it's funny, side tangent, prior life, prior organization,
264
00:18:26,797 --> 00:18:30,137
I had a client that I was really, really friendly with.
265
00:18:30,357 --> 00:18:36,957
And we were encountering the same problems with people and data week after week.
266
00:18:37,077 --> 00:18:40,837
So we just set up 30 minute data therapy every week.
267
00:18:40,857 --> 00:18:45,837
And it was just a safe space for the two of us to chat about what was going
268
00:18:45,837 --> 00:18:50,457
on, why it was frustrating, just get it out of our system.
269
00:18:50,737 --> 00:18:54,617
And then move on with the rest of the day. Yeah. It was actually very helpful.
270
00:18:54,817 --> 00:18:56,677
That's fantastic. That's fantastic.
271
00:18:56,957 --> 00:19:00,297
I always feel like everyone wants to do the right thing. At the end of the day,
272
00:19:00,337 --> 00:19:01,737
everybody wants to do the right thing.
273
00:19:01,757 --> 00:19:05,217
It's just the way they get there is often mirrored in, you know,
274
00:19:05,217 --> 00:19:08,277
just lack of trust, miscommunications, lack of communication,
275
00:19:08,557 --> 00:19:11,257
why things are not coming through, etc.
276
00:19:11,637 --> 00:19:15,857
When it does work well is they have this brainstorming session together.
277
00:19:15,857 --> 00:19:20,777
They'll get in a room together as a team and have maybe a couple of days of
278
00:19:20,777 --> 00:19:22,397
a workshop and just get through it all.
279
00:19:22,477 --> 00:19:25,097
And then they go back as long as they're on the same page. And then they come
280
00:19:25,097 --> 00:19:26,537
back together and retouch on that.
281
00:19:26,949 --> 00:19:30,969
And we've done that with some of our clients and that's worked really well as well.
282
00:19:31,069 --> 00:19:34,929
Just spending some time with them in a room for a few days, because especially
283
00:19:34,929 --> 00:19:37,849
with this virtual world that we live in, no one's making a connection.
284
00:19:37,989 --> 00:19:42,209
You can't connect with somebody you've never met with. That changes everything. That really does.
285
00:19:42,509 --> 00:19:49,489
It really does. You cannot be harsh or mean as easily when somebody is two feet
286
00:19:49,489 --> 00:19:52,469
away from you. But across the screen, I've seen it plenty.
287
00:19:52,569 --> 00:19:55,049
Yeah. Or an email or a text message or a phone call.
288
00:19:55,169 --> 00:19:58,089
Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. Actually, Sandy, as we've been talking,
289
00:19:58,189 --> 00:20:05,529
another thought came to me in terms of that unwillingness to share information, share priorities.
290
00:20:05,869 --> 00:20:07,469
And what I've been seeing a
291
00:20:07,469 --> 00:20:14,029
lot of is as organizations have gone through a reduction in force, right?
292
00:20:14,149 --> 00:20:19,929
And these data experts or experts in the organization's data have left.
293
00:20:20,049 --> 00:20:26,329
So now there's already a gap in understanding, understanding and we've asked others to fill that gap.
294
00:20:26,389 --> 00:20:29,349
And they're still learning. They're still trying to figure it out.
295
00:20:29,549 --> 00:20:34,089
So when you go and ask them for information, part of it is they may not know.
296
00:20:34,309 --> 00:20:39,989
But the other part is they're trying to keep it close to the vest as a job security move.
297
00:20:40,209 --> 00:20:43,549
And I think I'm starting to see that a little bit more as well.
298
00:20:43,589 --> 00:20:45,389
I don't know if you started to encounter that. Yeah, I have.
299
00:20:45,629 --> 00:20:49,309
And obviously it didn't work for the predecessors. Why do they they think it's going to work for them.
300
00:20:49,829 --> 00:20:54,609
Yeah, information is not job security. Even if you have a production system
301
00:20:54,609 --> 00:20:58,229
that has all the business logic and it's running or a model that you built,
302
00:20:58,329 --> 00:21:02,029
you actually build it for a specific request or a specific need.
303
00:21:02,169 --> 00:21:06,209
The angle the initial person had requested that information for is completely
304
00:21:06,209 --> 00:21:09,629
different from the one that the new person who's there in that seat is leveraging
305
00:21:09,629 --> 00:21:11,709
it for. So you have to rebuild it.
306
00:21:11,869 --> 00:21:16,489
I've seen that happen often often as well, which gives really high credence
307
00:21:16,489 --> 00:21:21,949
to the idea of not really institutionalizing. And I hate saying this because
308
00:21:21,949 --> 00:21:26,449
I don't fully believe in it, but truly institutionalizing BI.
309
00:21:27,165 --> 00:21:32,705
Because analytics is going to really be dynamic over time for organizations
310
00:21:32,705 --> 00:21:39,245
and having something quick and easy for them to go use for six months, that's good enough.
311
00:21:39,425 --> 00:21:42,905
To me, sometimes that's good enough. As long as the data is accurate,
312
00:21:43,165 --> 00:21:46,245
it's of quality, it's consistent.
313
00:21:46,425 --> 00:21:50,505
As long as all those things are there, everything in front of it doesn't really matter.
314
00:21:50,505 --> 00:21:59,425
So question for you, why do you believe or why have you seen the new user not
315
00:21:59,425 --> 00:22:03,445
using the asset in the way that it was intended?
316
00:22:03,825 --> 00:22:07,525
Is there a lack of documentation? Documentation? I mean, when was the last time
317
00:22:07,525 --> 00:22:09,405
you read a document? I don't read documentation.
318
00:22:09,465 --> 00:22:12,405
If I think about how we're streaming this and recording this right now,
319
00:22:12,565 --> 00:22:15,005
no, I just clicked on buttons. I figured it out.
320
00:22:15,125 --> 00:22:20,385
I think that's part of the reason is folks are moving really fast and they're
321
00:22:20,385 --> 00:22:21,905
not questioning what they're getting.
322
00:22:22,045 --> 00:22:25,425
They're happy to have the data. They're happy to have the report and they're
323
00:22:25,425 --> 00:22:28,565
not questioning the background use case of that information,
324
00:22:28,825 --> 00:22:32,225
why it was created, who created it, is the data valid until there's an issue.
325
00:22:32,405 --> 00:22:36,045
Yeah. Oh, for sure. I mean, as humans, one we
326
00:22:36,045 --> 00:22:38,845
hate documenting things even though we know
327
00:22:38,845 --> 00:22:41,585
we should but then also as humans
328
00:22:41,585 --> 00:22:44,705
we never really read the documentation when when it's
329
00:22:44,705 --> 00:22:49,825
in front of us anyways no we don't we don't yeah my favorite is when people
330
00:22:49,825 --> 00:22:53,505
ask for documentation and i'm like yeah sure we'll spend time doing that no
331
00:22:53,505 --> 00:22:59,685
problem you're not gonna read it you're absolutely not gonna read it but we'll
332
00:22:59,685 --> 00:23:02,885
do it we do charge by the hour. At least it's not by the page. Yeah.
333
00:23:04,865 --> 00:23:09,465
Oh my gosh. I guess if you had one piece of advice for an organization or for
334
00:23:09,465 --> 00:23:14,225
a consultant who's coming in and is triaging their client and thinking about,
335
00:23:14,445 --> 00:23:16,825
you know, how do I assess this?
336
00:23:17,165 --> 00:23:21,845
Either or. Client, consultant, you know, what is the one piece of advice you would give them?
337
00:23:21,965 --> 00:23:25,985
I think the biggest two pieces is really, and they do go hand in hand,
338
00:23:25,985 --> 00:23:32,725
but one is ensuring that you communicate to the point of over-communication.
339
00:23:33,485 --> 00:23:38,505
Communicate what are you trying to achieve? Why are you trying to achieve it?
340
00:23:38,925 --> 00:23:42,565
What's the path to get there? How do you know that you're there?
341
00:23:43,225 --> 00:23:48,685
And then also thinking about meeting your users, meeting your clients where
342
00:23:48,685 --> 00:23:50,345
they are, if you're a consultant.
343
00:23:50,505 --> 00:23:55,485
So as you go through your path of designing, how are we going to get from where
344
00:23:55,485 --> 00:23:57,265
we are today to where we need to go?
345
00:23:57,625 --> 00:24:02,945
Really thinking about, are you trying to give your clients the keys to a Cadillac
346
00:24:02,945 --> 00:24:06,985
when they haven't really learned how to walk yet? Those are fantastic.
347
00:24:07,445 --> 00:24:10,465
I agree with the overcommunication. conversation when we're brought
348
00:24:10,465 --> 00:24:13,225
into a client to finish something that is
349
00:24:13,225 --> 00:24:16,105
the only thing we're doing 24 7 that's the
350
00:24:16,105 --> 00:24:19,165
only thing on my mind right is those client problems what
351
00:24:19,165 --> 00:24:22,445
we're trying to achieve the client probably has 60 70
352
00:24:22,445 --> 00:24:25,885
other things that they're dealing with you get them for one hour a day and you're
353
00:24:25,885 --> 00:24:29,645
communicating to them they're not going to retain that information they may
354
00:24:29,645 --> 00:24:33,705
not be listening they may be multitasking especially now in the virtual world
355
00:24:33,705 --> 00:24:37,305
so you have to over communicate you have to do it in writing you have to do
356
00:24:37,305 --> 00:24:40,345
it verbally and you have to do it it six more times so they get the message.
357
00:24:40,525 --> 00:24:46,525
I think for me, the big one is just realize that they're humans across the table
358
00:24:46,525 --> 00:24:51,865
and think about them and their needs and be open and honest and ask them questions,
359
00:24:52,025 --> 00:24:54,725
probing questions about what else is bothering you?
360
00:24:54,905 --> 00:24:58,965
How can I make this easier for you? What other challenges are you dealing with?
361
00:24:59,105 --> 00:25:04,725
And try to figure out how you can help them get to where they need to be from where they are.
362
00:25:04,885 --> 00:25:09,405
And not just for that particular client, but also for the other individuals
363
00:25:09,405 --> 00:25:11,945
you have to work with to get things done for that client.
364
00:25:12,145 --> 00:25:17,805
And I think that's something that people often forget is that they're dealing with a human.
365
00:25:18,005 --> 00:25:21,385
And, you know, even though we have a task and we have a thing we have to go
366
00:25:21,385 --> 00:25:25,145
get, we have to enable the individuals that we're working with as well.
367
00:25:25,205 --> 00:25:30,845
I think like a big piece of that enablement is also thinking about for our stakeholders,
368
00:25:31,005 --> 00:25:32,305
for our sponsors, right?
369
00:25:32,630 --> 00:25:36,550
What's going to make them shine in the best light for their leadership?
370
00:25:36,830 --> 00:25:41,410
What's going to be important for them in their leadership's eyes to continue
371
00:25:41,410 --> 00:25:45,670
to justify their approach, their priorities and their objectives?
372
00:25:45,670 --> 00:25:48,830
Yeah, I still remember this. There's two things.
373
00:25:49,570 --> 00:25:57,770
Then we can kill this conversation. But I still remember I was a consultant early in my career.
374
00:25:57,870 --> 00:26:01,050
I did consulting and then I went to go work for a financial services firm.
375
00:26:01,170 --> 00:26:04,570
The first project I had, I had to go gather requirements from a bunch of people
376
00:26:04,570 --> 00:26:06,350
who were obviously abused by IT.
377
00:26:07,050 --> 00:26:11,310
They did not want to tell me anything. And I would go and spend hours with them
378
00:26:11,310 --> 00:26:14,270
at their desk and just kind of spend time with them, I'm getting to know them
379
00:26:14,270 --> 00:26:17,730
because my boss was like, you really need to get to know them as individuals.
380
00:26:17,950 --> 00:26:21,730
Don't think of this as I needed to go build a dashboard. Think about this as
381
00:26:21,730 --> 00:26:23,150
how do I enable their jobs?
382
00:26:23,430 --> 00:26:27,650
And that resonated with me so much because I saw a shift.
383
00:26:27,850 --> 00:26:32,390
Me just taking a lot of care about that individual and how they work and what
384
00:26:32,390 --> 00:26:37,230
they were trying to do with themselves and their teams changed the way they interacted with me.
385
00:26:37,470 --> 00:26:41,770
It took longer for sure, but it changed the way they interacted with me and
386
00:26:41,770 --> 00:26:45,130
that's kept me forever the other thing that i will say is,
387
00:26:45,810 --> 00:26:49,470
the biggest learning i had leaving consulting for seven
388
00:26:49,470 --> 00:26:54,870
eight years was what happens when the consultants leave that is that is another
389
00:26:54,870 --> 00:26:59,470
world i did not have an appreciation for and quite frankly it changed me as
390
00:26:59,470 --> 00:27:02,410
an individual as well and i think it made me a better consultant because a lot
391
00:27:02,410 --> 00:27:07,650
of times you come in you you just give them whatever right and you're walking out the door.
392
00:27:08,549 --> 00:27:12,109
Everybody has to deal with that. They have to maintain it. They have to make
393
00:27:12,109 --> 00:27:13,709
sure the end user understands it.
394
00:27:13,769 --> 00:27:16,589
They're dealing with all of that after the fact.
395
00:27:16,589 --> 00:27:23,389
Yeah, I think one of the most painful consulting experiences I had was,
396
00:27:23,469 --> 00:27:25,509
you know, working with an organization,
397
00:27:25,989 --> 00:27:31,009
setting up some great programs for them, leaving that that particular engagement,
398
00:27:31,209 --> 00:27:36,109
and then coming back eight months later to see what had happened while we were gone.
399
00:27:36,349 --> 00:27:40,049
Everything that we recommended everything we had built was gone.
400
00:27:40,209 --> 00:27:43,149
There was no evidence that we'd ever been there before.
401
00:27:44,109 --> 00:27:51,329
With this phone yeah exactly and you're just sitting there going i've spent
402
00:27:51,329 --> 00:27:55,149
all this time with you you you looked me in the eye and said you get it you
403
00:27:55,149 --> 00:27:56,769
understand you know why it's important,
404
00:27:57,549 --> 00:28:02,069
but you lied you lied to me i've seen i've actually seen the opposite of that
405
00:28:02,069 --> 00:28:06,429
yeah i do i do understand that whole yeah we left them with a bunch of stuff
406
00:28:06,429 --> 00:28:09,989
we walk away come back and check in it's completely different world the wild
407
00:28:09,989 --> 00:28:13,349
wild west yeah so bad habits easy Easy to perfect. Yeah.
408
00:28:13,469 --> 00:28:16,869
Easy to go back. So this has been fun. This is our second one down. How do you feel?
409
00:28:17,089 --> 00:28:23,089
I feel good. I feel really good. I feel like we unleashed some of our pent up
410
00:28:23,089 --> 00:28:25,749
dress, I guess, is the best way to describe it.
411
00:28:26,149 --> 00:28:31,329
Oh my God. We just sound like two miserable old lady consultants.
412
00:28:31,829 --> 00:28:34,929
I got these stories for you from a long time ago.
413
00:28:36,089 --> 00:28:40,769
It's not even fair to use the term, but we're war veterans. No offense to the
414
00:28:40,769 --> 00:28:43,749
armed forces out there. I mean, it's crazy.
415
00:28:44,720 --> 00:29:07,201
Music.